Riddick

Riddick v. Sony Electronics Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 23, 20243:24-cv-00319California1,273 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BERT RIDDICK, et al., Case No. 24-cv-00319-BAS-JLB

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

v. MOTION TO SEAL (ECF No. 18) SONY ELECTRONICS, INC., et al.,

Defendants. 16 Presently before the Court is Defendant Sony Electronics’s (“Sony”) motion to seal. (ECF No. 18.) Defendant seeks to file under seal portions of Plaintiff Bert Riddick’s Amended Complaint and Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendants’ motion to dismiss. These documents were previously filed on the docket. Plaintiff does not oppose. (ECF No. 21.) For the reasons herein, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ motion. (ECF No. 21.) 22 I. LEGAL STANDARD “[T]he courts of this country recognize a general right to inspect and copy public records and documents, including judicial records and documents.” Nixon v. Warner Commc’ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 (1978). “Unless a particular court record is one ‘traditionally kept secret,’ a ‘strong…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.