Marner

Marner v. Farmers Insurance

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 30, 20243:24-cv-01469California1,225 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ZACHARY MARNER, Case No.: 24-cv-1469-RSH-BLM

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

v.

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

FARMERS INSURANCE, et al., AND DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT

PREJUDICE

Defendants.

[ECF No. 2]

18 On August 16, 2024, Plaintiff Zachary Marner, proceeding pro se, filed this civil 19 action against Farmers Insurance d/b/a Bristol West Insurance, Luis Alvarez, and David 20 Coddie. ECF No. 1. At the time of filing, Plaintiff did not prepay the civil filing fees 21 required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a); instead, he filed a Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis 22 (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(a). ECF No. 2.

I. MOTION TO PROCEED IFP

24 Generally, all parties instituting a civil action in this court must pay a filing fee. See 25 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a); CivLR 4.5(a). However, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), the court may 26 authorize the commencement, prosecution or defense of any suit without payment of fees 27 if…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.