Earle
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Earle
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 3, 20243:22-cv-01914California2,487 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE Case No.: 3:22-cv-01914-H-SBC
COMMISSION,
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF
Plaintiff, SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE v. COMMISSION’S MOTION IN
LIMINE TO ADMIT RECORDED
JOSEPH R. EARLE, JR., BARRY D.
STATEMENTS OF DEFENDANTS
REAGH, WILLIAM CLAYTON,
JOSEPH R. EARLE, JR. AND
FRANCIS T. DUDLEY, STEVEN E.
BARRY D. REAGH
BRYANT, UPPER STREET
17 MARKETING, INC., and PROJECT GROWTH INTERNATIONAL, INC., [Doc. Nos. 106, 120.] Defendants. 20 On June 27, 2024, Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) filed a motion in limine to admit recorded statements of Defendants Joseph R. Earle, Jr. (“Earle”) and Barry D. Reagh (“Reagh”). (Doc. Nos. 106, 120.) On July 15, 2024, Defendants Earle, Reagh, and William Clayton (“Clayton”) filed an opposition to the motion in limine. (Doc. Nos. 110, 116.) On July 22, 2024, the SEC filed a reply. …