Earle

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Earle

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 3, 20243:22-cv-01914California2,487 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE Case No.: 3:22-cv-01914-H-SBC

COMMISSION,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF

Plaintiff, SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE v. COMMISSION’S MOTION IN

LIMINE TO ADMIT RECORDED

JOSEPH R. EARLE, JR., BARRY D.

STATEMENTS OF DEFENDANTS

REAGH, WILLIAM CLAYTON,

JOSEPH R. EARLE, JR. AND

FRANCIS T. DUDLEY, STEVEN E.

BARRY D. REAGH

BRYANT, UPPER STREET

17 MARKETING, INC., and PROJECT GROWTH INTERNATIONAL, INC., [Doc. Nos. 106, 120.] Defendants. 20 On June 27, 2024, Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) filed a motion in limine to admit recorded statements of Defendants Joseph R. Earle, Jr. (“Earle”) and Barry D. Reagh (“Reagh”). (Doc. Nos. 106, 120.) On July 15, 2024, Defendants Earle, Reagh, and William Clayton (“Clayton”) filed an opposition to the motion in limine. (Doc. Nos. 110, 116.) On July 22, 2024, the SEC filed a reply. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.