Zamora

Zamora v. Bridgecrest Credit Company, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 5, 20243:24-cv-00236California8,744 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ADRIAN ALBERTO ZAMORA, Case No.: 24-CV-236 TWR (DEB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

v. UNOPPOSED MOTION TO

DISMISS, GRANTING

BRIDGECREST CREDIT COMPANY,

DEFENDANT’S REQUEST FOR

LLC, an agent and servicer for Carvana JUDICIAL NOTICE, AND

LLC,

DISMISSING ACTION WITH

16 Defendant. PREJUDICE 17 (ECF No. 4) 18 Presently before the Court is Defendant Bridgecrest Credit Company, LLC’s unopposed Motion to Dismiss Complaint (ECF No. 4 (“Mot.”)). Also before the Court is Defendant’s Request for Judicial Notice. (ECF No. 4-1 (“RJN”).) The Court took this matter under submission without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). (See ECF No. 6.) Having carefully considered Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. 1 (“Compl.”)), Defendant’s arguments, and the relevant law, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint pursuant to …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.