Riddick

Riddick v. Sony Electronics Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 9, 20243:24-cv-00319California3,835 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 BERT RIDDICK, et al., Case No.: 24-cv-00319-BAS-JLB

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART

v. MOTION FOR ENTRY OF

PROTECTIVE ORDER

SONY ELECTRONICS, INC. et al,

Defendants. [ECF No. 30] 18 19 Before the Court is Defendant Sony Electronics, Inc.’s (“Defendant”) Motion for Entry of Protective Order (“Motion for Protective Order”). (ECF No. 30.) Respective counsel for both Plaintiffs and Defendant previously contacted the Court indicating a dispute over proposed language for a protective order. (ECF No. 29.) The Court ordered briefing, and Defendant accordingly filed the instant motion, including proposed language for a protective order. (Id.; ECF No. 30.) Plaintiffs filed a Response in Opposition containing their own proposed language. (ECF No. 39.) For the reasons herein, the Court GRANTS IN PART the Motion for Protective Order. I. THE PARTIES’ DISAGREEMENT The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.