Epenesa
Epenesa v. Commissioner of Social Security
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 KRISTINE E., Case No.: 24-CV-1182-GPC-MMP
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
v. DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA
MARTIN O’MALLEY,
PAUPERIS
Defendant. [ECF No. 2]
16 On July 9, 2024, Kristine E. (“Plaintiff”) filed a Social Security appeal pursuant 17 to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) of the Social Security Act, seeking judicial review of the 18 decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“Defendant”) 19 denying Plaintiff’s application for Disability Insurance Benefits under Title II of the 20 Social Security Act. ECF No. 1 ¶ 3. Plaintiff also filed the instant Motion for Leave to 21 Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”). ECF No. 2. 22 All parties instituting any civil action, suit, or proceeding in a United States 23 District Court, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a $405 filing
25 1 In accordance with Civil Local Rule 7.1(e)(6)(b), the Court refers to all…