Christopher
Christopher v. Knight Brook Insurance
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CARREA CHRISTOPHER, Case No.: 23-cv-01608-JAH-DEB
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
v. COMPEL ARBITRATION
KNIGHT BROOK INSURANCE; [ECF No. 10]
BRIDGER INSURANCE; SANTANDER
CONSUMER USA,
16 Defendants. 17
19 INTRODUCTION Pending before this Court is Defendant Santander Consumer USA’s (“Defendant”) Motion to Compel Arbitration. ECF No. 10 (the “Motion” or “Mot.”). Plaintiff, Carrea Christopher (“Plaintiff” or “Christopher”), did not file an Opposition. The Motion is decided without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1.d.1. Upon consideration of the Motion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Compel Arbitration is GRANTED. /// /// BACKGROUND On August 31, 2023, Plaintiff, a pro se litigant, filed a complaint against Knight Brook Insurance, Bridger Insurance, and Defendant Santander Consumer USA (an automobile…