Castro

Castro v. Gipson

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 6, 20243:24-cv-00789California5,156 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DENNIS CASTRO, Case No.: 3:24-cv-00789-DMS-DEB

CDCR #V33841,

ORDER (1) GRANTING MOTION

Plaintiff, TO PROCEED IN FORMA vs. PAUPERIS;

(2) DENYING MOTION FOR

CONNIE GIPSON, J. HILL, AMADOR, RECONSIDERATION AS MOOT;

D. EUSTQUIO, SEGOVIA, WINGO, AND

SURKHI, VILORIA, GONZALEZ,

MOECKLY, MOSELEY, SMITH, (3) DISMISSING COMPLAINT

WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR

Defendants. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH FED.

R. CIV. P.

20 21 I. INTRODUCTION On May 1, 2024, Plaintiff Dennis Castro, currently incarcerated at Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility (“RJD”) in San Diego, California, and proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See ECF No. 1. On May 9, 2024, the Court dismissed the action because Plaintiff failed to pay the filing fee or move to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.