Tan

Tan v. Quick Box, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 9, 20243:20-cv-01082California4,159 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LEANNE TAN, Individually and On Case No.: 20cv1082-LL-DDL Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

Plaintiff, PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF v. CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT 14 [ECF Nos. 350, 398] AND QUICK BOX, LLC, et al., DENYING MOTION TO SEAL AS Defendants MOOT [ECF No. 351] 16 __________________________________ AND RELATED CROSSCLAIMS AND

THIRD-PARTY CLAIMS.

19 20 On June 12, 2020, Plaintiff Leanne Tan filed a putative consumer fraud class action against alleged operators of an online “free trial” scam. ECF No. 1. On January 7, 2021, Plaintiff filed the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”), which remains operative. ECF No. 89. Plaintiff alleges Defendants fraudulently lured her, and other consumers like her, into purchasing a monthly installment of La Pura skin care products by offering “free samples” of the products. FAC, ¶¶ 8–12. Despite assurances Plaintiff would only have to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.