McKnight

McKnight v. Snopes Media Group, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 11, 20243:24-cv-00762California517 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL WILLIAM MCKNIGHT, Case No.: 24cv762-RBM (MSB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S EX

v. PARTE MOTION TO CONTINUE THE

EARLY NEUTRAL EVALUATION [ECF NO.

SNOPES MEDIA GROUP, INC., 10] Defendant. 16 17 On September 10, 2024, Plaintiff Daniel William McKnight (“Plaintiff”) filed an ex parte motion to continue the Early Neutral Evaluation (“ENE”) conference scheduled for September 13, 2024. (ECF No. 10 (“Motion”).) In it, Plaintiff explains that attending the ENE in person would be a great hardship since he received “an urgent assignment from the New York Post” that required him to be in Nashville, Tennessee for at least two more days from the date he filed his motion. (ECF No. 10-2 at 2.) He further explained that the assignment is a “significant opportunity . . . both professionally and financially, . . . [which he could not] simply abandon without repercussions to [his] career and 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.