Vashisht-Rota
Vashisht-Rota v. Harrisburg University
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 APARNA VASHIST-ROTA, Case No.: 20-cv-967-AGS-KSC
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
v. RECONSIDERATION [Doc. No. 118] HARRISBURG UNIVERSITY, Defendant. 16 On August 18, 2021, plaintiff moved for reconsideration of the Court’s prior Discovery Order dated August 20, 2024. See Doc. No. 119. Briefing has concluded— including an extra, unauthorized Reply filed by plaintiff, which the Court exercises its discretion to consider because plaintiff, as a pro se litigant, may not have been aware that she must file a single Reply, not a Reply to each Opposition. See Doc. Nos. 127, 128, 131, 132.1 Plaintiff makes numerous arguments in support of reconsideration. See generally Doc. No. 118. The Court will address them all.
25 In its Order setting a briefing schedule, the Court ordered plaintiff to provide proof 26 of service as to non-party Howell Management Services, LLC (“Howell”). Doc. No. 119.…