Sutaniman
Sutaniman v. Axos Bank
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 IN RE AXOS BANK LITIGATION Case No.: 23-cv-2266-RSH-SBC
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO COMPEL
ARBITRATION OR DISMISS
16 [ECF No. 27] 17 18 Before the Court is a motion to compel arbitration or to dismiss filed by defendant Axos Bank d/b/a UFB Direct (“UFB”). ECF No. 27. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7.1(d)(1), the Court finds the motion presented appropriate for resolution without oral argument. For the reasons below, the Court grants in part and denies in part UFB’s motion. I. BACKGROUND The instant case is a consolidated putative class action brought by customers holding savings accounts with UFB. It is one of several related cases pending in this District. See Ash et al v. Axos Bank, 24-cv-01157-RSH-SBC; Pliszka v. Axos Bank, 3:24- cv-00445-RSH-SBC. The Consolidated Amended Complaint (“CAC”) alleges Plaintiffs and other UFB customers…