Pliszka
Pliszka v. Axos Bank
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSEPH PLISZKA, individually and on Case No.: 24-cv-445-RSH-SBC behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO COMPEL
AXOS BANK, d/b/a UFB DIRECT, ARBITRATION OR DISMISS Defendant. 16 [ECF No. 10] 17 18 Before the Court is a motion to compel arbitration or to dismiss, filed by defendant Axos Bank d/b/a UFB Direct (“UFB”). ECF No. 10. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7.1(d)(1), the Court finds the motion presented appropriate for resolution without oral argument. For the reasons below, the Court grants in part and denies in part UFB’s motion. I. BACKGROUND The instant case is a putative class action brought by customers holding money market accounts with UFB. It is one of several related cases pending in this District. See 27 28 In re Axos Bank Litigation, 3:23-cv-2266-RSH-SBC, Kyle Ash et al v. Axos…