Bryson

Bryson v. Madden

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 7, 20243:22-cv-00556California1,019 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RONALD BRYSON, Case No.: 3:22-cv-00556-JES-VET

Petitioner,

ORDER ON PETITIONER’S

v. MOTION FOR DEFAULT

RAYMOND MADDEN, et al., [Doc. No. 32] Respondents. 16 17 Before the Court is Petitioner Ronald Bryson’s (“Petitioner”) Motion of Objection to Order Granting Request for an Extension of Time to File Response and Motion for Entry of Default (“Motion”). Doc. No. 32. For the reasons detailed below, the Court DENIES the Motion. I. BACKGROUND Petitioner, proceeding pro se, is incarcerated at the Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility in San Diego, California. On September 18, 2023, Petitioner filed an Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (“Amended Petition”). Doc. Nos. 23. The Petition raises 120 claims. Id. Due in part to Petitioner’s voluminous claims, the Court initially granted Respondents Raymond Madden and Rob Bonta (“Respondents”) a sixty-day extension to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.