Reynolds

Reynolds v. O' Malley

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 22, 20243:24-cv-01667California1,660 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANGELA MARIE R., Case No.: 3:24-cv-01667-AHG Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO

v.

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

MARTIN J. O’MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security, [ECF No. 3] 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 On September 18, 2024, Plaintiff Angela Marie R. (“Plaintiff”) brought this action against the Commissioner of Social Security, seeking judicial review of the Commissioner’s final administrative decision denying her application for Disability Insurance Benefits for lack of disability. ECF No. 1. Along with her Complaint, Plaintiff also filed a Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. ECF No. 3. I. LEGAL STANDARD A motion to proceed IFP presents two issues for the Court’s consideration. First, the Court must determine whether an applicant properly shows an inability to pay the $4051 civil filing fee required by this Court. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a),…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.