Siddell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No.: 24-cv-910-DMS-DEB

LEROY GEORGE SIDDELL,

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S v. MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK

OF JURISDICTION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant.

17 Pending before the Court is Defendant United States of America’s motion to dismiss Plaintiff LeRoy George Siddell’s Complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1). (Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, (Motion), ECF No. 7). Plaintiff, a licensed attorney but proceeding pro se, did not file a response in opposition. The Court found this matter to be suitable for resolution without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). (ECF No. 8). For the following reasons, Defendant’s Motion is granted.

25 1 Civil Local Rule 7.1(f)(3)(c) states that if an opposing party fails to file a response in opposition to a motion,…