Charman
Charman v. California Check Cashing Stores, LLC.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THANE CHARMAN, Case No. 24-cv-0695-BAS-MMP
Plaintiff,
ORDER:
v. 1. ISSUING SUMMONS FOR
FIRST AMENDED
CALIFORNIA CHECK CASHING COMPLAINT (ECF No. 14); STORES, LLC, et al., AND Defendants. 2. TERMINATING AS MOOT
MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF
No. 7)
Presently before the Court is Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 14.) Plaintiff is proceeding pro se. Plaintiff previously requested an extension to respond to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. (ECF No. 11.) Thereafter, Plaintiff filed the First Amended Complaint instead of an opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. (ECF No. 14.) Consequently, Plaintiff has submitted a First Amended Complaint that fails to comply with the requirements of Rule 15(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Rule 15(a) permits amendment of pleadings as a matter of …