J.J
J.J v. Ashlynn Marketing Group, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 J.J. and C.D., on behalf of themselves and Case No.: 24-CV-0311-GPC-MSB all others similarly situated
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S
Plaintiffs, MOTION TO DISMISS IN PART v. AND DENYING DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO DISMISS IN PART
ASHLYNN MARKETING GROUP,
INC.,
[ECF No. 17] 16 Defendant.
18 On April 2, 2024, Plaintiffs J.J. and C.D. filed their First Amended Complaint 19 (“FAC”), individually and on behalf of three putative classes. ECF No. 7. Before the 20 Court is Defendant’s motion to dismiss the FAC pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil 21 Procedure 9(b) and 12(b)(6). ECF No. 17. Plaintiffs filed an opposition on June 14, 22 2024. ECF No. 21. Defendant filed a reply on June 28, 2024. ECF No. 22. The Court 23 has considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion to dismiss 24 and deem this motion appropriate for resolution without oral argument. See L.R. 25 7.1(d)(1). For the below reasons, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s motion to dismiss in…