Valle

Valle v. Obler

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 24, 20243:23-cv-02128California3,995 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 OSCAR ESTEBAN VALLE, Case No.: 3:23-cv-2128-WQH-DEB

CDCR #BT7058

SCREENING ORDER RE SECOND

Plaintiff, AMENDED COMPLAINT vs. 14 (1) DISMISSING DEFENDANTS

STANICH AND SHANNAHAN AS

PARTIES;

DR. RICHARD OBLER, SHANNAHAN,

(2) DISMISSING SPECIFIED

COLLEEN STANICH, POLICE OFFICER

CAUSES OF ACTION FOR

JOHN DOE,

FAILING TO STATE A CLAIM

Defendants. PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) AND 1915A(b);

(3) DIRECTING MARSHAL

SERVICE AS TO DEFENDANT

OBLER PURSUANT TO

28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) AND Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3)

I. INTRODUCTION Oscar Esteban Valle (“Plaintiff” or “Valle”), a state inmate currently housed at the California Medical Facility is proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 12, 2024,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.