Bratt

Bratt v. MGA Entertainment

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 25, 20243:23-cv-01467California923 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRYAN MARSHALL BRATT, Case No.: 23-cv-1467-RSH-VET

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

v. SET ASIDE DISMISSAL AND FOR

LEAVE TO AMEND

MGA ENTERTAINMENT et al.,

Defendants. [ECF No. 38] 16 17 This is the second of two substantially similar lawsuits for copyright infringement that Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed against Defendant MGA Entertainment, Inc., and others. Plaintiff filed his first lawsuit, Bratt v. MGA Entertainment, Inc., No. 22-cv-1984- RSH-WVG (S.D. Cal.) (“Bratt I”), on December 14, 2022. On July 6, 2023, the Court granted Defendant’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim and dismissed the first action without prejudice. Approximately two months later, on August 10, 2023, Plaintiff filed this instant lawsuit (“Bratt II”). ECF No. 1. On January 22, 2024, the Court granted Defendant’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, based on Plaintiff’s failure to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.