4WEB, Inc. v. NuVasive, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 24, 20243:24-cv-01021California2,573 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 4WEB, INC., Case No.: 24-CV-1021 JLS (MMP)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S

MOTION FOR PATENT CLAIM

NUVASIVE, INC.,

REDUCTION

Defendant. (ECF No. 79) 16 17 18 19 Presently before the Court is Defendant NuVasive, Inc.’s Motion for Patent Claim Reduction (“Mot,” ECF No. 79), to which Plaintiff 4WEB, Inc. filed an Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Patent Claim Reduction (“Opp’n,” ECF No. 84) and Defendant filed a Reply (“Reply,” ECF No. 86). After considering the Parties’ arguments and the law, the Court rules as follows. BACKGROUND Plaintiff accuses Defendant of infringing 128 claims across eleven patents relating to spinal implant technology. The patents at issue are U.S. Patent Nos. 8,430,930 (the “’930 patent”); 9,999,516 (the “’516 patent”); 9,545,317 (the “’317 patent”); 11,278,421 (the “’421 patent”); …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.