Merrit
Merrit v. Cogley
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA IAN MERRITT, an individual, Case No.: 23cv1031-CAB-KSC
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
v. RECONSIDERATION
JONATHAN COGLEY, an individual; AND DOES 1 TO 30, inclusive, [Doc. No. 38] 17 Defendants.
19 On July 26, 2024, this Court issued an Order Denying Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave 20 to File First Amended Complaint (the “July 26 Order”). [Doc. No. 34.] On August 23, 21 2024, Plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration of the July 26 Order. [Doc. No. 38.] On 22 September 13, 2024, Defendant filed an opposition to the motion for reconsideration. 23 [Doc. No. 43.] No reply has been filed. For the reasons set forth below, the motion for 24 reconsideration is DENIED. 25 Plaintiff moves for reconsideration under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e). 26 However, Rule 59(e) is not applicable because it governs motions to alter or amend a final 27 judgment. Nevertheless, the Court will construe Plaintiff’s motion as a traditional motion 28 for…