OBrien
OBrien v. Siege Electric, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES O’BRIEN, et al., Case No. 23-cv-00897-BAS-DEB
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTFFS’
Plaintiffs, MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT (ECF
v. No. 16) SIEGE ELECTRIC, INC., Defendant. 17 Plaintiffs James O’Brien, Ricky Jordan, Tim Matthes, Jeremy Burton, Gregory Drummonds, and Joshua Walter bring this action against Defendant Siege Electric, Inc., for violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), the California Labor Code, and California’s Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 (“PAGA”). (Compl., ECF No. 1.) On May 30, 2024, Plaintiffs filed a Motion to Approve the Settlement Agreement (“Settlement” or “Settlement Agreement”). (Mot., ECF No. 16.) The Court finds this motion suitable for determination on the papers submitted and without oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); CivLR 7.1(d)(1). For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS the Motion for Approval of the Settlement Agreement. 27 28 I. …