Jane Doe Nos. 60 through 121 v. Aylo Media S.A.R.L.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 25, 20243:23-cv-01821California475 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JANE DOE NOS. 60 through 121 Case No.: 23-cv-1821-WQH-KSC inclusive, individuals, ORDER Plaintiffs, 12 v. 13 AYLO MEDIA S.A.R.L., (f/k/a “MindGeek S.a.r.l.”) a foreign entity; AYLO FREESITES, LTD., (f/k/a “MG Freesites, Ltd.” and d/b/a “PornHub,” “YouPorn,” “RedTube,” and “Tube8”) a foreign entity; AYLO BILLING US CORP., (f/k/a “MG Billing US Corp.” and d/b/a “ProBiller”) a Delaware corporation; 9219-1568 QUEBEC, INC., a foreign entity; and AYLO HOLDINGS S.A.R.L.,

22 Defendants. 23 HAYES, Judge: 24 The matter before the Court is the Motion to Withdraw as Counsel of Record (ECF 25 No. 34) filed by counsel for Defendants, Michael T. Zeller, Diane Cafferata, Robert 26 Becher, and Michelle Wang of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP (collectively, 27 “Quinn Emanuel”). 28 “An attorney may not withdraw as counsel except by leave of court, and the decision ||to grant or deny counsel’s motion to withdraw is committed to the discretion of the trial ||court.” Urias v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.