Ross

Ross v. Schlaman 1758

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 26, 20243:24-cv-01078California2,496 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SEAN DION ROSS, Case No.: 3:24-cv-1078-CAB-KSC

CDCR #BX-0976

ORDER: (1) GRANTING MOTION

Plaintiff, TO PROCEED IN FORMA vs. PAUPERIS [ECF No. 2] AND

SHLAMAN, LEACH, R. PAGE, CITY OF

(2) DISMISSING COMPLAINT

SAN DIEGO,

WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND

Defendants. WITH LEAVE TO AMEND

I. INTRODUCTION On June 20, 2024, Sean Dion Ross (“Plaintiff” or “Ross”), an inmate currently housed at California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility and proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, along with Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”). ECF Nos. 1, 2. In his Complaint, Plaintiff alleges his Fourth Amendment rights were violated when San Diego police officers searched his apartment without a warrant. ECF No. 1 at 3. For the reasons discussed below, the Court grants Ross’s IFP motion and dismisses the Complaint…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.