Pontier
Pontier v. GEICO Insurance
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID PONTIER, Case No.: 21cv199-LL-DDL
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
v. WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL OF
RECORD FOR DEFENDANT
GEICO INSURANCE, et al.,
JOSEPH DANG
Defendants.
16 [ECF No. 152]
18 Before the Court is a Motion from Klinedinst, PC, (“Counsel”) to withdraw as counsel of record for Defendant Joseph Dang (“Dang”). ECF No. 152 (“Motion”). No opposition has been filed. The Court finds this matter suitable for determination on the papers and without oral argument pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). Upon review of the Motion and the applicable law, the Court GRANTS the Motion for the reasons set forth below. I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY Plaintiff David Pontier, proceeding pro se, filed a complaint in federal court in Nevada on August 5, 2020 against GEICO Insurance, Farmers Insurance, JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Phia Group, LLC, the…