Quintero

Quintero v. Hill

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 2, 20243:24-cv-01141California793 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL R. QUINTERO, Case No.: 24cv1141-AJB (KSC)

CDCR # BN-3161

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

Plaintiff, PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS vs. AND DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION

H. HILL, Warden, et al.,

Defendants. 17 Plaintiff Daniel R. Quintero, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 along with a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (ECF Nos. 1-2.) I. Motion to Proceed IFP All parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in a district court of the United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of $405, consisting of a $350 statutory fee plus an additional administrative fee of $55, although the administrative fee does not apply to persons granted leave to proceed IFP. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) (Judicial Conference Schedule of Fees, District Court Misc. Fee Schedule, § 14 (eff. Dec. 1, 2023)).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.