Rao

Rao v. Vista Superior Court

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 2, 20243:24-cv-01716California1,392 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VINOD RAO, Case No.: 24cv1716 RSH (MSB)

Petitioner,

ORDER DISMISSING CASE

v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE

VISTA SUPERIOR COURT, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a detainee in the custody of the Department of Homeland Security, Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, proceeding pro se, has filed a Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging a San Diego Superior Court judgment of conviction and resultant sentence to two years of probation. ECF No. 1. For the reasons discussed below, the Court dismisses the case without prejudice. I. FAILURE TO SATISFY THE FILING FEE REQUIREMENT Petitioner has failed to pay the $5.00 filing fee and has failed to move to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court cannot proceed until Petitioner has either paid the $5.00 filing fee or has qualified to proceed in forma pauperis. See R. 3(a), Rules Governing Section 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.