S.T.G.

S.T.G. v. Epic Games, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 2, 20243:24-cv-00517California6,310 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 S.T.G., S.B.G., and S.J.G., minors, by Case No.: 24-cv-517-RSH-AHG and through their guardian SAMUEL 12 GARCIA; I.H. and E.H., minors, by and ORDER (1) GRANTING IN PART through their guardian ARNOLD AND DENYING IN PART HERNANDEZ; and M.A. and E.V.A., DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO 14 minors, by and through their guardian COMPEL ARBITRATION; AND (2) STEPHANIE ALLEN; individually and DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION on behalf of all others similarly situated; TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL

AUTHORITY

Plaintiffs, 17 v. 18 [ECF Nos. 12, 15]

EPIC GAMES, INC.,

19 Defendant. 20 21 Before the Court is a motion to compel arbitration or in the alternative to transfer venue, filed by defendant Epic Games, Inc, ECF No. 12, as well as Defendant’s motion for leave to file supplemental authority, ECF No. 15. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1), the Court finds the motions appropriate for resolution without oral argument. As set forth below, the Court grants in part and denies in part Defendant’s motion to compel, and denies as moot…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.