Chapman

Chapman v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 28, 20243:23-cv-01588California2,673 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TERESA C., Case No.: 23-cv-1588-DEB Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

v.

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL JUDGMENT AND DENYING

SECURITY, DEFENDANT’S CROSS-MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Defendant. [DKT. NOS. 12, 14] 16

I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Teresa C. seeks judicial review of the Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of her application for disability benefits. Dkt. No. 1. The parties filed cross-motions for Summary Judgment, and Plaintiff filed a reply. Dkt. Nos. 12, 14, and 15. 22 23

25 1 In the interest of privacy, this Order uses only the first name and the initial of the last name of the non-governmental party in this case. 27 For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 12) and DENIES Defendant’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 14). II. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.