Dang

Dang v. Pontier

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20243:19-cv-01519California1,548 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSEPH DANG, Case No.: 19cv1519-LL-DDL

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL OF

RECORD FOR

DAVID PONTIER, et al.,

PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-

Defendants. DEFENDANT JOSEPH DANG

DAVID PONTIER, [ECF No. 217] Counter-Claimant, v. JOSEPH DANG, et al., Counter-Defendants. 22 Before the Court is a Motion from Klinedinst, PC, (“Counsel”) to withdraw as counsel of record for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Joseph Dang (“Dang”). ECF No. 217 (“Motion”). No opposition has been filed. The Court finds this matter suitable for determination on the papers and without oral argument pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). Upon review of the Motion and the applicable law, the Court GRANTS the Motion for the reasons set forth below. I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY On August 13, 2019, Plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.