Noon

Noon v. Liberty Insurance Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 3, 20243:23-cv-02257California1,315 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIAM NOON, ADELE NOON, Case No.: 23-cv-2257-JAH-BJC

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S

v. EX PARTE REQUEST TO MODIFY

SCHEDULING ORDER

LIBERTY INSURANCE

CORPORATION and DOES 1 through [ECF No. 33] 50, inclusive,

16 Defendants. 17 Before the Court is Defendant Liberty Insurance Corporation’s Ex Parte Request to Modify the Scheduling Order. ECF No. 33. Plaintiffs William and Adele Noon oppose the motion. ECF No. 34. After consideration of the papers submitted by the parties, and for the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES the motion. I. BACKGROUND This case arises from actions alleged in two matters filed in the Superior Court for the State of California. Plaintiffs filed the present lawsuit on November 1, 2023 (ECF No. 1), against Liberty Insurance for failing to defend and/or indemnify Plaintiffs in two underlying lawsuits. On December 12, 2023, Defendant removed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.