Ashcroft v. Southern California Permanente Medical Group

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 2, 20243:24-cv-00035California3,396 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHARRY ASHCROFT, Case No. 24-cv-35-MMA (MMP)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO DISMISS

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PERMANENTE MEDICAL GROUP, [Doc. No. 10] et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 20 Before the Court is Defendant Southern California Permanente Medical Group’s (“Defendant”) motion to dismiss Plaintiff Sharry Ashcroft’s (“Plaintiff”) amended complaint in its entirety pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Doc. No. 10. Plaintiff filed an opposition, Doc. No. 12, to which Defendant replied, Doc. No. 15. The Court found the matter suitable for determination on the papers and without oral argument pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7.1.d.1. See Doc. No. 17. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendant’s motion to dismiss. I. BACKGROUND …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.