Shallowhorn

Shallowhorn v. Carrillo

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 3, 20243:24-cv-00399California7,451 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALFRED E. SHALLOWHORN, Case No.: 24-cv-0399-WQH-BJC

CDCR #P-13049,

ORDER: (1) GRANTING MOTION

Plaintiff, TO PROCEED IN FORMA vs. PAUPERIS; AND

(2) DISMISSING COMPLAINT FOR

J. CARRILLO, F. NUNEZ, J. GALINDO;

FAILING TO STATE A CLAIM

ESTRADA, JOHN DOE #1; JOHN DOE

PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C.

#2, G. HOPPER, H. MOSELEY, F. §§ 1915(e)(2) & 1915A(b)

GUZMAN, R. VELEZ,

Defendants. 19

21 BACKGROUND On February 26, 2024, Plaintiff Alfred E. Shallowhorn (“Plaintiff” or “Shallowhorn”), an inmate proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. ECF No. 1. The Court dismissed the action without prejudice on March 11, 2024 because Plaintiff failed to satisfy the filing fee requirement under U.S.C. § 1914(a). ECF No. 3. The Court notified Plaintiff that in order to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.