Berghuis

Berghuis v. Ford Motor Company, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 7, 20243:22-cv-00871California4,686 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VICTORIA BERGHUIS, on behalf of Case No.: 3:22-cv-00871-JES-KSC herself and others similarly situated,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT

Plaintiff, FORD MOTOR COMPANY’S v. MOTION TO DISMISS THE

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

FORD MOTOR COMPANY, INC.; and 15 DOES 1 to 10, inclusive, [ECF No. 35-1] 16 Defendant. 17 18 Pending before the Court is Defendant Ford Motor Company, Inc.’s (“Ford”) motion to dismiss (“Motion”) Plaintiff Victoria Berghuis’s (“Berghuis”) Second Amended Complaint for deficient pleading, failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, lack of equitable jurisdiction and lack of subject matter jurisdiction due to lack of Article III standing. ECF No. 35-1. Plaintiff filed an opposition (ECF No. 36), and Defendant filed a reply (ECF No. 39). After due consideration and for the reasons discussed below, the Motion is GRANTED. // // // I. BACKGROUND A. Regulatory…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.