Castro
Castro v. Cintas Corporation No. 3
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
DAMIAN A. CASTRO, individually and Case No. 3:24-cv-00932-AJB-MMP on behalf of all others similarly situated,
CLASS ACTION
Plaintiff, Order Dismissing Plaintiff’s Class 14 Claims Without Prejudice and vs. Individual Claims With Prejudice
16 CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 3 and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive,
18 Defendants. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On September 9, 2024, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss Plaintiffs class 2 || claims without prejudice and Plaintiffs individual claims with prejudice. All parties 3 || have agreed to the dismissal. In light of the stipulation, Plaintiffs class claims are dismissed without prejudice 5 || and Plaintiff's individual claims are dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule 6 || of Civil Procedure 41. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i); see also Ripley v. 7 || Bridgestone Retail Ops., LLC., No. C09-1482 RSM, 2010 WL 11684294, at *2 (W.D. 8 || Wash. Sept. 2, 2010) (citing Moore’s Federal Practice 3d, § 23.64[2][a] (2007)); see …