Ostrander
Ostrander v. Teradata Corporation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VINCENT OSTRANDER, individually Case No. 24-cv-01034-BAS-MSB and on behalf of all others similarly 12 situated, ORDER: 13 Plaintiff, (1) GRANTING BRIAN JURKO’S 14 v. MOTION TO APPOINT LEAD PLAINTIFF AND TERADATA CORPORATION, et al.,
APPROVE CO-LEAD
16 Defendants. COUNSEL (ECF No. 3); AND 17 (2) DENYING AS MOOT
VINCENT OSTRANDER’S
MOTION TO APPOINT
LEAD PLAINTIFF AND
APPROVE LEAD COUNSEL
(ECF No. 4) 22
This case is a putative securities class action brought on behalf of all persons who purchased or otherwise acquired Teradata Corporation securities between February 13, 2023, and February 12, 2024. (Compl. ¶ 1, ECF No. 1.) The Complaint alleges Teradata and its executive officers made false or misleading statements about the company’s 28 financials, causing significant losses to class members …