Wave Neuroscience, Inc. v. PeakLogic, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 7, 20243:21-cv-01330California4,318 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Wave Neuroscience, Inc., a Delaware Case No.: 21cv1330-CAB-SBC corporation,

ORDER ON MOTION FOR

Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant, SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF v. INVALIDITY

Peaklogic, Inc., a Delaware corporation; [Doc. No. 207] and Kevin T. Murphy, M.D., a Professional Corporation, doing business as Mindset, 17 Defendants/Counterclaim Plaintiffs.

19 Plaintiff Wave Neuroscience, Inc. (“Wave”) alleges that defendants Peaklogic, Inc. 20 and Kevin Murphy, M.D. (hereafter jointly “Peaklogic”) infringe certain claims of U.S. 21 Patents Nos. 8,475,354 (‘354 patent); 8,480,554 (‘554 patent); and 9,446,259 (‘259 22 patent). Peaklogic moves for summary judgment of invalidity contending all the asserted 23 claims are directed to a natural phenomenon and not patentable subject matter under 35 24 U.S.C. § 101. [Doc. No. 207.] Wave filed an opposition. [Doc. No. 216.] Peaklogic 25 filed a reply. [Doc. No. 227.] The Court held argument on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.