1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSE ANTONIO BARRIOS-COTA, Case No.: 23cv2185-LL-AHG

A# 028791625,

12

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION

Petitioner, 13 AND CLOSING CASE v. 14

CHRISTOPHER LAROSE, Warden., 15 Respondent. 16 17 On November 28, 2023, Petitioner Jose Antonio Barrios-Cota filed a Petition for a 18 Writ of Habeas Corpus (“Petition”) under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. ECF No. 1.1 19 Petitioner challenges his prolonged immigration detention following an order of 20 removal. ECF No. 1. Petitioner alleges that he has been held in immigration custody by the 21 United States Department of Homeland Security’s Immigration and Customs Enforcement 22 division (“ICE”) since December 5, 2022. Id. at 2. Petitioner seeks a bond hearing before 23 an immigration judge or for “the Attorney General or ICE [to] set a ‘bond’ so that Petitioner 24 can advocate for himself,” return to immigration court, “and have a fair Immigration trial.” 25 Id. at 13. 26 27 1 Pin citations refer to the CM/ECF page numbers electronically stamped at the top of each 28 1 On July 8, 2024, the Court ordered Respondent to file a response to the Petition by 2 August 7, 2024 and include any documents relevant to the determination of the issues 3 raised in the Petition. ECF No. 5 at 2. The Court also stated that Petitioner could file an 4 optional reply by September 6, 2024. Id. 5 On July 22, 2024, Respondent filed a Return in Opposition to Petition for Writ of 6 Habeas Corpus (“Return”) and attached copies of the orders and documents referenced in 7 the Return. ECF No. 6. In the Return, Respondent stated that on March 21, 2024, an 8 immigration judge found Petitioner inadmissible, denied all applications for relief, and 9 ordered him removed to Mexico. Id. at 2; ECF No. 6-1 at 7–10. This removal order became 10 final on July 11, 2024. ECF No. 6 at 2; ECF No. 6-1 at 11–13. Respondent stated that on 11 July 15, 2024, Petitioner’s removal order was executed when he was removed from the 12 United States to Mexico. ECF No. 6 at 2; ECF No. 6-1 at 14–15. 13 The Court finds that Petitioner’s action is now moot. When Petitioner filed his 14 habeas petition, he sought a bond hearing or for the government to “set a ‘bond’ so that 15 Petitioner can advocate for himself.” ECF No. 1 at 13. His Petition does not challenge his 16 conviction. Now that Petitioner has been removed from the United States and is no longer 17 in ICE custody, the Court is without power to grant the relief requested and the Petition is 18 therefore moot. Picrin-Peron v. Rison, 930 F.2d 773, 775 (9th Cir. 1991) (citation omitted) 19 (“If it appears that we are without power to grant the relief requested, then this case is 20 moot.”); see also Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 7 (1998) (noting that a petition can become 21 moot if it no longer presents a case or controversy under Article III, 22 § 2, of the Constitution by reason of lacking an actual injury traceable to a defendant that 23 / / / 24 / / / 25 / / / 26 / / / 27 / / / 28 / / / 1 capable of being redressed by a favorable judicial decision). Accordingly, the Court 2 || DISMISSES the Petition as moot. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this case. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 Dated: October 11, 2024 NO 5 Je J 6 Honorable Linda Lopez 5 United States District Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28