Herta

Herta v. Roberts

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 10, 20243:24-cv-01698California1,179 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARIA HERTA, Case No.: 24-CV-1698 JLS (BLM)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

AND DISMISSING COMPLAINT

TERRIE E. ROBERTS,

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Defendant. (ECF Nos. 1 & 2) 16 Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Maria Herta’s Complaint (“Compl.,” ECF No. 1), and Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP Mot.,” ECF No. 2). Having considered both documents and the law, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s IFP Motion and DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiff’s Complaint. IFP MOTION All parties instituting a civil action, suit, or proceeding in a district court of the United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of $405. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). An action may proceed despite the plaintiff’s failure to

26 1 In addition to the $350 statutory fee, all parties filing civil actions must pay an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.