Spriggs

Spriggs v. City of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 9, 20243:24-cv-01006California5,724 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RAYMOND SPRIGGS, an individual, Case No.: 24-cv-01006-W-KSC Plaintiff, 14 v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED

THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO; SAN COMPLAINT [DOC. 9]

DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT;

OFFICER CAMERON WATSON; and

DOES 1–50,

18 Defendants. 19 Pending before the Court is the City of San Diego (the “City”) and Officer Cameron Watson’s motion to dismiss ([Doc. 9], “Motion”) Plaintiff Raymond Spriggs’s (“Plaintiff”) first amended complaint ([Doc. 3], “FAC”) in its entirety. Plaintiff opposes ([Doc. 11], “Opposition”) and the City and Officer Watson have replied ([Doc. 12], “Reply”). The Court decides the matter on the papers submitted and without oral argument. See CivLR 7.1(d)(1). For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS the Motion. 26 27 28 I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND This case arises from two separate traffic stops performed by San Diego Police Department (“SDPD”) officers on Plaintiff, both of which…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.