Castillo

Castillo v. United States

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 11, 20243:24-cv-01017California3,587 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ARTURO MARCELINO CASTILLO, Case No.: 24-cv-1017-BTM-DEB

BOOKING #92864-298,

ORDER:

Plaintiff, 13 vs. (1) GRANTING MOTION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS,

15 JOHN DOES 1-300 and USA, (2) DISMISSING DOE Defendants. DEFENDANTS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) & 1915A(b), and

(3) DIRECTING U.S. MARSHAL TO

EFFECT SERVICE OF COMPLAINT

AND SUMMONS ON DEFENDANT

USA PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) & Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) 22 23 Plaintiff Arturo Marcelino Castillo, an inmate at the Federal Correctional Institution in Fairton, New Jersey, is proceeding pro se in this civil action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971) and the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”). (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff claims that while housed as a pretrial detainee at the Metropolitan Correctional Center …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.