Haver

Haver v. General Mills, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 11, 20243:24-cv-01269California2,393 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DIANA HAVER, on behalf of herself, all Case No.: 3:24-cv-01269-CAB-MMP others similarly situated, and the general public,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

Plaintiff, REMAND v.

GENERAL MILLS, INC.,

15 Defendant. [ECF No. 4]

ORDER

Plaintiff Diana Haver filed her putative class action lawsuit in San Diego County Superior Court. [ECF No. 1-2, “Complaint.”] Her case theory is that Defendant General Mills deceptively marketed “Fruit Snacks” to contain “Real Fruit Juice,” when, according to Plaintiff, the snacks in question were sweetened entirely with added sugars. [Compl. ¶ 3.] Plaintiff brought claims under the California Unfair Competition Law (UCL) and the California False Advertising Law (FAL) in state court seeking both injunctive relief and equitable relief in the form of disgorgement and restitution. [See Compl. ¶¶ 59, 77.] Defendant removed to federal court, claiming jurisdiction under the Class Action Fairness Act, and Plaintiff moved for remand. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.