Hanson

Hanson v. Theranest, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 25, 20243:24-cv-00086California4,591 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 LAURA HANSON, Case No.: 24-cv-00086-AGS-JLB Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’

v.

MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE

THERANEST, LLC, et al., ORDER

Defendants. [ECF No. 42]

Before the Court is a Motion for Protective Order filed by Defendants TheraNest, LLC (“TheraNest”), Therapy Brands Holdings, LLC (“Therapy Brands”), and Jennifer Wolfe (collectively “Defendants”) (ECF No. 42), which Plaintiff Laura Hanson (“Plaintiff”) opposes (ECF No. 43). On September 19, 2024, Defendants filed a reply (ECF No. 48), and on September 23, 2024, Plaintiff filed a surreply (ECF No. 49). For the reasons set forth below, Defendants’ motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. I. BACKGROUND A. Underlying Case The instant case arises out of Plaintiff’s employment as a Director of Compliance by and subsequent termination from TheraNest. (See generally ECF No. 24, Second Amended 28…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.