Jordan

Jordan v. Ortega

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 21, 20243:23-cv-02100California988 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 MICHAEL MARCUS JORDAN, Case No.: 23-cv-2100-BAS-JLB Inmate #22710656,

ORDER:

1. DIRECTING CLERK TO RE- Plaintiff,

ISSUE SUMMONS AND IFP

15 vs. PACKET, 2. DIRECTING MARSHAL TO

EFFECT SERVICE, and 17 3. GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME (ECF No. 14)

G. ORTEGA, G. SAN-VACTORES,

Defendants. 20 21 Plaintiff lately notified this Court that he has been unable to move the case forward and, due to impending surgery, will need an extension of time to effect service of process on Defendants. (See ECF No. 14.) Plaintiff requires an extension of time in which to serve the Defendants because the 90-day period within which service must be executed has expired. While the Court tolls Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 4(m)’s time limit for service while the Court conducts its initial screening, see Butler v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.