RMS NA, Inc. v. RMS (AUS) PTY LTD

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 15, 20243:24-cv-01366California8,583 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 RMS NA, INC., Case No.: 24-cv-01366-AJB-MMP Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S EX v. PARTE APPLICATION FOR

TEMPORARY RESTRAINING

RMS (AUS) PTY LTD, an Australian ORDER limited proprietary company; RMS

GLOBAL PTY LTD, an Australian (Doc. No. 8) limited proprietary company; P & J 17 BUTTIGIEG NOMINEES PTY LTD, an Australian limited proprietary company; PETER ANTHONY BUTTIGIEG, an 19 individual; JENNIFER LYNN BUTTIGIEG, an individual; ASCOTT 2 PTE LTD, an Australian limited 21 proprietary company; ADVENT PARTNERS 3 FUND LP, an Australian limited proprietary company; and DOES 23 1–100 Defendants.

25 Presently pending before the Court is Plaintiff RMS NA, Inc.’s ex parte application 26 for a temporary restraining order (“TRO”). (Doc. No. 8.) Defendant RMS (Aus) Pty Ltd. 27 28 (“RMS Australia”) filed an opposition in response. (Doc. No. 16.) The Court heard oral 2 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.