Ainsworth

Ainsworth v. Macrombre

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 15, 20243:24-cv-01482California1,324 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TYRELL AINSWORTH, Case No.: 24cv1482-AJB (AHG)

CDCR #AL-4915,

ORDER:

Plaintiff, 13 vs. 1) DENYING MOTION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

AS BARRED BY 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); JEFF MACOMBER, Secretary, et al., 16 Defendants. 2) DENYING MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT COMPLAINT; and

18 3) DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR

FAILURE TO PAY FILING FEE

20 REQUIRED BY 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) 21 On August 19, 2024, Plaintiff Tyrell Ainsworth, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, along with a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (ECF Nos. 1-2.) On September 3, 2024, the Court denied the IFP motion and dismissed this action for failure to satisfy the filing fee requirement. (ECF No. 2.) Plaintiff subsequently filed a First Amended Complaint, a Motion to supplement the complaint, a Second Amended Complaint, a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.