Emert
Emert v. San Diego Board of Supervisors
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 21, 20243:24-cv-00671California1,238 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT EMERT, Case No.: 24-cv-00671
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING IFP,
v. SCREENING COMPLAINT,
DENYING MOTION FOR
SAN DIEGO BOARD OF
MISCELLANEOUS RELIEF, &
SUPERVISORS, COUNTY OF SAN
ORDERING MARSHAL SERVICE
DIEGO, DAWN BALERIO DDA
ACTING IN HIS OFFICIAL
CAPACITY, AND DAI LUIS PENA
ACTING IN HER OFFICIAL
CAPACITY, Defendants. 20
On April 12, 2024, pro se Plaintiff Robert Emert filed a complaint alleging that Defendants violated his constitutional rights and state law in conducting his arrest and denying him bail. Along with his complaint, Plaintiff filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). Dkt. 2. On August 5, 2024, Plaintiff filed an amended motion for IFP, Dkt. 3, and a motion for miscellaneous relief including consolidated expedited review by a single three-judge panel, pre-discovery, an evidentiary hearing, and an…