Emert

Emert v. San Diego Board of Supervisors

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 21, 20243:24-cv-00671California1,238 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT EMERT, Case No.: 24-cv-00671

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IFP,

v. SCREENING COMPLAINT,

DENYING MOTION FOR

SAN DIEGO BOARD OF

MISCELLANEOUS RELIEF, &

SUPERVISORS, COUNTY OF SAN

ORDERING MARSHAL SERVICE

DIEGO, DAWN BALERIO DDA

ACTING IN HIS OFFICIAL

CAPACITY, AND DAI LUIS PENA

ACTING IN HER OFFICIAL

CAPACITY, Defendants. 20

On April 12, 2024, pro se Plaintiff Robert Emert filed a complaint alleging that Defendants violated his constitutional rights and state law in conducting his arrest and denying him bail. Along with his complaint, Plaintiff filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). Dkt. 2. On August 5, 2024, Plaintiff filed an amended motion for IFP, Dkt. 3, and a motion for miscellaneous relief including consolidated expedited review by a single three-judge panel, pre-discovery, an evidentiary hearing, and an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.