Bennett

Bennett v. Navy Federal Credit Union

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 21, 20243:24-cv-00295California766 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FRANK BENNETT, Case No.: 24-cv-00295-W-MMP

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v.

1. GRANTING IN PART AND NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION,

DENYING IN PART JOINT

MOTION TO AMEND Defendant.

SCHEDULING ORDER; AND

2. EXTENDING FACT

DISCOVERY CUTOFF ONLY

19 [ECF No. 36]

21 Before the Court is the parties’ joint motion to amend the scheduling order. [ECF No. 36.] First, the parties seek to extend the fact discovery cutoff of October 25, 2024 by forty-five (45) days, or in the alternative, twenty-one (21) days following a ruling on the parties’ discovery disputes. The parties represent they have engaged in substantial discovery, stating Defendant served its responses to written discovery, and Plaintiff’s responses are due by October 21, 2024 based on the parties’ agreement. The parties have also engaged in several depositions, though Plaintiff’s deposition has not yet occurred…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.