Sos
Sos v. Costco Wholesale Corporation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 ROBERT SOS, Case No.: 3:24-cv-00459-GPC-AHG Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART
JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND
v.
DISCOVERY DEADLINE
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, et al., [ECF No. 12] 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 Before the Court is the parties’ joint motion to amend the scheduling order. ECF No. 12. The parties seek an order from the Court continuing the fact discovery deadline and settlement conference by approximately 45 days and 60 days, respectively. Id. Parties seeking to continue deadlines in the scheduling order, or other deadlines set forth by the Court, must demonstrate good cause. FED. R. CIV. P. 16(b)(4) (“A schedule may be modified only for good cause and with the judge’s consent”); see also ECF No. 7 at 8 (Scheduling Order, stating that “[t]he dates [] set forth herein will not be modified except for good cause shown”); Chmb.R. at 2 (stating that any request for continuance requires “[a] showing of good cause for the request”).…